事件概要：當大市長要整死小老師．．．
奉天承運 市府督學升堂嚴辦
07年12月13日，下午四點，距離狀告郝龍斌約一個月，教評會中午開會認定我有「教學不力」的事實，決議開始不適任教師的輔導程序。解聘案依法需通知當事人到場說明，但我卻未被告知。教評會開會通知單上寫：「奉（教育局）督學指示臨時召開。」
這在一般解聘程序裡是前所未有的狀況。督學是類似檢察官的角色，監督學校業務，豈能像法官一樣，介入審議程序呢？
先射箭再畫靶 屈指成罪
也許大家會好奇，到底對我的指控有那些？指控很多，連在休息室放置私人物品都有。然而不管從程序或證據上看，這些指控都不成立。
首先，最重要的，是程序荒謬。教評會在下午二點就結束，已經作出我是不適任教師的決議，然後，督學才帶著人在上課中突襲檢查我的班級，並且拍照錄影存證。
第二，證據作假。督學突襲檢查的時間是下午第二堂課，那天前一堂也排了課，所以我一直都在教室內，怎麼會遲到？
第三，紅衛兵式鬥爭。後來（2008年1月3日）學校對全部二、三年級作問卷調查，而且學生覺得內容對我很不公平。只要有少部份的學生對我不滿意或是要惡作劇，學校就能達成收集「具體事證」的目的(相關"證據"照片)。
市府督學親臨 是非變色
2008年1月7日，我跟學校要求罪證，學校說資料列為「保護證物」拒絕提供。之後在證據不明的情況下，開了三次考績會、三次教評會，先有大過又要解聘。我強調「一事不二罰」但沒用。台北市政府對外說是審慎決定，但前四次會議都否決提案，直到督學蒞臨才通過。
如果，教評會真的是公平、公正、公開，那為什麼督學可以進入指導，但前來關心的台北市教師會總幹事羅德水老師，和我請的律師，卻不准入內？
教育局越權操作 違法亂紀
依規定，教育局只有審議權，一旦認為程序有誤或罪證不足時，就退件回學校，再由校方補正或撤銷。但教育局卻不但沒有退件，反而在2008年2月12日破天荒組成調查團，直接到校「調查」事實。
果然，教育局英明地查出更多新事證，作為解聘理由。其中錯誤連連，例如台北市教育局副局長林騰蛟指鹿為馬，說我自稱獲得Power教師獎，因此構成「公然說謊誤導媒體」，然而從無此說法。足見教育局的查證工作之草率。
特別要指出的是，將「公然說謊誤導媒體」列為不適教師的事由，是台北市教育局絕無僅有的獨家發明，因此我才會說我是被市府解聘。
「龍」命難違 專權復辟
郝龍斌主張教科書應實施一綱一本政策，但國內主要的教育學者，教師組織，教改團體都認為一綱一本違反教育原則，不符時代潮流。但最後郝市長還是以民調結果支持一綱一本為由，對專業意見置之不顧。
我以為台灣有言論自由，但事實好像不是如此。問過教師會內很多老師、律師、教改專業人士，都說台北市政府所提出的理由，不構成解聘的要件。但結果是跌破所有人的眼鏡，2008年3月13日，我被解聘了！
我以為台灣已經是民主社會，於是想透過司法解決爭議，提出行政訴訟。
而故事才剛開始．．．
參考資料：中山國中教師蕭曉玲解聘案大事記
Hsiaoling Hsiao(蕭曉玲): jobless as the result of being against the power？
The former junior school teacher Hsiaoling Hsiao got intentionally laid off by the school she worked for only because she accused Longbin Hao, (郝龍斌) the Mayor of Taipei of breaking the law (One-Guideline-One-Text).
Hsiaoling Hsiao(蕭曉玲), was a teacher of junior school in Taiwan till the end of 2007, because of her accusing the Mayor, not only was she laid off by the school, but also was she blacklisted by the Education Ministry of Taiwan that she will not be able to teach in any educational institute national wide. This punishment equals the punishment for those teachers who commit sexual abuse.
Meihui Tseng, (曾美蕙) The principal of the school Ms. Hsiao used to work for, wrote a book and defamed Ms. Hsiao in an article of a book she wrote with others. This book was distributed to many schools national wide, ruined the reputation of Ms. Hsiao totally. No wonder that dozens of NGOs in Taiwan called it as “revival of political persecution”
During the incident procedure, the interference of government can be seen everywhere. The school inspector implied to reactive the lay-off policy on the performance evaluation conference. Protests against her with white cloth strips from the parental association. These organized activities against her was launched and informed via faxes from the Education Bureau.
Tengjiao Lin, (林騰蛟) head of the Taiwan Education Bureau slandered Hsiao at the press conference of “shameless lying and mislead the media”. When asked about when Hsiao was found not qualified, Lin said repeatedly “on November 12th。” exactly the day when she accused the Mayor!
According to the school, Hsiao got laid off because of scrimshank to the work. The evidence backing up the accusation is more than ridiculous – a photo of a watch is said to be the evidence of late for work; a photo with Hsiao holding the telephone for business use at school was accused of using mobile phone during class; a falsified journal showing the date November 31st – a date never exists, and other similar non-existing evidence. Also falsified testimony from the students saying she showed entertaining film in class instead of teaching according to the schedule, talking about political sensitive topics. (One-Guideline-One-Text)
The punishment to Hsiao works now as a warning to others, aroused the anxiety and fear of many other teachers. Till today, the injustice treatment to Hsiao is still remaining. “All what we can do now is wishing her all the best” says the National Federation of Teachers Union.
Hsiao eventually sacrificed for this case, it led to following bad consequence –tens of thousands of NTD spent in vain，thousands students’ right offended.
For more information, please go to Ms. Hsiao’s blog, address as below
http://iamhsiao.blogspot.com/
--
